Comments for I think I thought http://www.thought.net Jason L. Wright Sun, 14 Aug 2011 02:34:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on IPv6 tunnel with ssh by jason http://www.thought.net/index.php/2008/12/ipv6-tunnel-with-ssh/#comment-79 jason Sun, 14 Aug 2011 02:34:24 +0000 http://www.thought.net/index.php/2008/12/ipv6-tunnel-with-ssh/#comment-79 I do not have linux machines on which to test at the moment. However, the two blocks I used in the examples are both from a routed /48, but I sliced that /48 into two /64s (2001:470:b813:f001:: and 2001:470:b813:f000::). Linux may not like my (ab)use of the fe80 link local addressing for point to point links, so you may need to use a /64 for that. I believe the use of link local addressing to be kosher, but link local addressing has its own funkyness.. Like requiring -i (or -I) for ping6 on linux. I do not have linux machines on which to test at the moment.

However, the two blocks I used in the examples are both from a routed /48, but I sliced that /48 into two /64s (2001:470:b813:f001:: and 2001:470:b813:f000::). Linux may not like my (ab)use of the fe80 link local addressing for point to point links, so you may need to use a /64 for that. I believe the use of link local addressing to be kosher, but link local addressing has its own funkyness.. Like requiring -i (or -I) for ping6 on linux.

]]> Comment on IPv6 tunnel with ssh by Coolmax http://www.thought.net/index.php/2008/12/ipv6-tunnel-with-ssh/#comment-78 Coolmax Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:38:20 +0000 http://www.thought.net/index.php/2008/12/ipv6-tunnel-with-ssh/#comment-78 Could You rewrite this rules for linux? I'm trying same thing with my boxes, I can ping6 one from another but i cannot ping6 world from my home box. First, can I assign 2001:470:b813:f001::1 (from your example) to tun0? Second, If these addresses (2001:470:b813:f000::, 2001:470:b813:f001::) are from /64 or /48 prefix? Could You rewrite this rules for linux? I’m trying same thing with my boxes, I can ping6 one from another but i cannot ping6 world from my home box. First, can I assign 2001:470:b813:f001::1 (from your example) to tun0? Second, If these addresses (2001:470:b813:f000::, 2001:470:b813:f001::) are from /64 or /48 prefix?

]]> Comment on Lilliefors test for exponentiality by Todd http://www.thought.net/index.php/2010/12/lilliefors-test-for-exponentiality/#comment-6 Todd Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:11:47 +0000 https://www.thought.net/?p=19#comment-6 Nice. I have been using Octave fairly heavily recently as it uses matlab syntax. I have successfully dropped in code written for matlab and had it execute without issue. I have never used R but I guess now is a good time to look into it. Nice. I have been using Octave fairly heavily recently as it uses matlab syntax. I have successfully dropped in code written for matlab and had it execute without issue. I have never used R but I guess now is a good time to look into it.

]]> Comment on Lilliefors test for exponentiality by jason http://www.thought.net/index.php/2010/12/lilliefors-test-for-exponentiality/#comment-5 jason Sun, 02 Jan 2011 16:49:53 +0000 https://www.thought.net/?p=19#comment-5 Yes, I have an implementation (for R) for the test which I intend to post soon. Also for R, the "nortest" package contains the Lilliefors test for normality (both tests are available in the MATLAB statistics toolbox). Yes, I have an implementation (for R) for the test which I intend to post soon. Also for R, the “nortest” package contains the Lilliefors test for normality (both tests are available in the MATLAB statistics toolbox).

]]> Comment on Lilliefors test for exponentiality by todd http://www.thought.net/index.php/2010/12/lilliefors-test-for-exponentiality/#comment-4 todd Sun, 02 Jan 2011 02:01:53 +0000 https://www.thought.net/?p=19#comment-4 So have you done anything with Lilliefors? I have just started looking at the same basic issue of 'goodness of fit'. So have you done anything with Lilliefors? I have just started looking at the same basic issue of ‘goodness of fit’.

]]>